Category: Project Reflections

You said:
Let’s create a short twine game. What kind of basic information literacy skill would work for Twine?
Copilot said:
Copilot
Great idea! Twine works really well for interactive storytelling and branching scenarios, so the best information literacy skills to teach are those that involve decision-making and critical thinking. Here are a few that fit perfectly:

✅ Skills That Work Well in Twine
Evaluating Sources

Players choose between different sources (e.g., a blog, a peer-reviewed article, a government site) to complete a research task.
Each choice leads to consequences—good or bad—based on credibility.
Keyword Searching

Players experiment with different keywords or Boolean operators to find relevant information.
Branches show how search results change with different strategies.
Recognizing Bias

Players read snippets of text and decide if the source is biased or objective.
Wrong choices could lead to misleading information in the game narrative.
Citation Basics

Players collect information and then choose how to cite it correctly.
Incorrect citations could lead to penalties or funny consequences in the story.
Distinguishing Scholarly vs. Popular Sources

Players pick sources for a research paper and learn the impact of choosing the wrong type.
Would you like me to:

Draft a simple Twine script for one of these skills (with passages and choices)?
Create a branching map to visualize the game structure?
Or combine multiple skills into one short game?
Which skill feels most useful for your audience?

You said:
Draft a simple twine script for distinguishing scholarly vs. popular sources.
Copilot said:
Copilot
Here’s a basic Twine script for a short game teaching how to distinguish scholarly vs. popular sources. I’ll use Twine’s Harlowe syntax (most common for beginners):

Title: The Research Quest: Scholarly or Popular?
:: Start
You need sources for your research paper on climate change. You open your browser and find three options:

[[A blog post by a travel influencer|Blog]]
[[An article in Nature Climate Change|Scholarly]]
[[A news piece from a major newspaper|News]]

:: Blog
The blog post is colourful and personal, but it lacks citations and is written by someone without scientific credentials.

Is this scholarly or popular?
[[Scholarly|WrongBlog]]
[[Popular|CorrectBlog]]

:: WrongBlog
Oops! This is not scholarly. Blogs are usually personal and lack peer review.
[[Try again|Start]]

:: CorrectBlog
Correct! Blogs are considered popular sources.
[[Next|NextStep]]

:: Scholarly
The article is published in a peer-reviewed journal, includes citations, and is written by experts.

Is this scholarly or popular?
[[Scholarly|CorrectScholarly]]
[[Popular|WrongScholarly]]

:: CorrectScholarly
Great job! Scholarly sources are peer-reviewed and written by experts.
[[Next|NextStep]]

:: WrongScholarly
Not quite. This is definitely scholarly.
[[Try again|Start]]

:: News
The news piece is timely and written for a general audience. It summarizes research but does not include detailed methodology.

Is this scholarly or popular?
[[Scholarly|WrongNews]]
[[Popular|CorrectNews]]

:: CorrectNews
Right! News articles are popular sources.
[[Next|NextStep]]

:: WrongNews
Incorrect. News articles are not scholarly.
[[Try again|Start]]

:: NextStep
You’ve learned the basics! Scholarly sources = peer-reviewed, detailed, expert-written. Popular sources = general audience, no peer review.
[[Play again|Start]]
✅ This script:

Introduces three common source types.
Uses branching choices for immediate feedback.
Reinforces the concept with short explanations.
Would you like me to:

Expand this into a full game with more examples (magazine, Wikipedia, trade publication)?
Add a scoring system so players track correct answers?
Or make it visually engaging with CSS styling and images?

You said:
how do i put this script into Twine?
Copilot said:
Copilot
Here’s how you can put that script into Twine:

Step 1: Install or Open Twine
Go to https://twinery.org.
Click Use it online or download the desktop app.
Step 2: Create a New Story
Click + Story.
Give it a title (e.g., Scholarly vs. Popular).
Choose a story format: Harlowe (default) works fine for this script.
Step 3: Add Passages
Twine uses passages for each section of text.
Copy the script I gave you and paste each section into its own passage:
Click + Passage and name it exactly as in the script (e.g., Start, Blog, Scholarly, etc.).
Paste the text for that passage.
Step 4: Link Passages
Twine automatically creates links when you use [[Link Text|Passage Name]].
After pasting the script, you’ll see arrows connecting passages in the map view.
Step 5: Test Your Game
Click Play (bottom-right) to preview.
Check that all links work and passages display correctly.
Optional Enhancements
Add CSS styling: Click Story → Edit Story Stylesheet.
Add images or colours for visual appeal.
Add variables for scoring (e.g., set $score to 0).
Do you want me to: ✅ Give you a ready-to-paste Twine file (.html) with this script?
✅ Or expand the script with scoring and more examples before you import it?
**end chat**

Copilot chat for Creating H5P Activities

Today

You said:

Let’s make some H5P activities for microlearning basic information literacy skills. Please generate activity type suggestions with 2 learning outcomes each that align with Blooms taxonomy for the following information literacy skills: how to read a scholarly journal article, developing a research topic, and evaluating information using the SIFT method.

Copilot said:

Copilot

Here are some H5P activity type suggestions for each skill, with two learning outcomes aligned to Bloom’s taxonomy:

1. How to Read a Scholarly Journal Article

Activity Type: Interactive Video

Embed a short video explaining article structure with clickable hotspots for definitions (abstract, methods, discussion).

Learning Outcomes:

Understand: Identify the purpose of each section in a scholarly article.

Apply: Use section headings to locate specific information within an article.

Activity Type: Drag and Drop

Learners match article sections to their functions.

Learning Outcomes:

Remember: Recall common components of a scholarly article.

Analyze: Distinguish between sections that summarize findings versus those that explain methodology.

2. Developing a Research Topic

Activity Type: Branching Scenario

Learners choose from broad topics and refine them through guided questions.

Learning Outcomes:

Apply: Narrow a broad subject into a focused research question.

Evaluate: Judge whether a research question is specific and researchable.

Activity Type: Fill in the Blanks

Provide sentences with missing keywords for topic refinement (e.g., “My topic is ______ because ______”).

Learning Outcomes:

Understand: Explain why a topic needs to be narrowed for effective research.

Create: Formulate a clear, focused research question.

3. Evaluating Information Using the SIFT Method

Activity Type: Quiz (Multiple Choice + True/False)

Questions about applying SIFT steps to sample sources.

Learning Outcomes:

Understand: Describe each step of the SIFT method.

Apply: Use SIFT to determine the credibility of a source.

Activity Type: Interactive Book

Learners explore examples of sources with embedded reflection questions.

Learning Outcomes:

Analyze: Compare sources to identify signs of bias or misinformation.

Evaluate: Decide whether a source is trustworthy based on SIFT criteria.

Would you like me to design one complete H5P activity for each skill, including instructions, content, and feedback, or create a full microlearning module outline with multiple activities per skill?

You said:

Design one complete h5p activity for each skill but let’s swap out the interactive video for skill 1 to be an image hotspot.

Copilot said:

Copilot

Here’s a complete design for one H5P activity per skill, with the first activity using Image Hotspots instead of Interactive Video:

✅ Skill 1: How to Read a Scholarly Journal Article

Activity Type: Image Hotspots

Title: Explore the Anatomy of a Scholarly Article

Description: Learners click on hotspots placed over an image of a scholarly article to learn about each section.

Content:

Upload an image of a sample article layout (title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, references).

Add hotspots for:

Abstract: “Summarizes the research question, methods, and findings.”

Introduction: “Provides background and states the research question.”

Methods: “Explains how the research was conducted.”

Results: “Presents the data and findings.”

Discussion: “Interprets results and connects them to the research question.”

References: “Lists sources cited in the article.”

Learning Outcomes:

Understand: Identify the purpose of each section in a scholarly article.

Apply: Use section headings to locate specific information within an article.

✅ Skill 2: Developing a Research Topic

Activity Type: Branching Scenario

Title: From Idea to Research Question

Description: Learners start with a broad topic and make choices to refine it into a focused research question.

Structure:

Start: “You want to research climate change. What’s your next step?”

Option A: “Pick a region” → leads to narrowing by geography.

Option B: “Pick an impact” → leads to narrowing by effect (e.g., agriculture, health).

Next: Add 2–3 more decision points (e.g., time frame, population).

End: Display the final research question and feedback: “Your question is specific and researchable.”

Learning Outcomes:

Apply: Narrow a broad subject into a focused research question.

Evaluate: Judge whether a research question is specific and researchable.

✅ Skill 3: Evaluating Information Using the SIFT Method

Activity Type: Quiz (Multiple Choice + True/False)

Title: Can You Trust This Source?

Description: Learners apply SIFT steps to evaluate a sample source.

Questions:

Multiple Choice: “What is the first step in SIFT?”

Options: Stop, Investigate the source, Find better coverage, Trace claims (Correct: Stop)

True/False: “Checking other sources is part of ‘Investigate the source.’” (False)

Scenario Question: Show a screenshot of a tweet or article headline. Ask: “Which SIFT step would help you verify this claim?”

Options: Stop, Investigate, Find better coverage, Trace claims (Correct: Find better coverage)

Learning Outcomes:

Understand: Describe each step of the SIFT method.

Apply: Use SIFT to determine the credibility of a source.

✅ Next Steps

Would you like me to:

Create full text and feedback for each activity (ready to copy into H5P)?

Provide a visual mock-up for the Image Hotspots activity (with hotspot labels)?

Or design a complete microlearning module outline that combines these activities into a flow?

You said:

Create full text and feedback for each activity that is ready to copy into H5P.

Copilot said:

Copilot

Here’s a ready-to-copy package for each H5P activity, including titles, instructions, content, and feedback:

✅ Activity 1: How to Read a Scholarly Journal Article

Type: Image Hotspots

Title: Explore the Anatomy of a Scholarly Article

Instructions:

Click on each hotspot to learn about the purpose of different sections in a scholarly article.

Image: Use a screenshot or mock-up of a scholarly article layout.

Hotspots & Text:

Title & Authors:

Shows the topic and who conducted the research.

Abstract:

Summarizes the research question, methods, and findings in a brief paragraph.

Introduction:

Provides background information and states the research question or hypothesis.

Methods:

Explains how the research was conducted, including procedures and tools.

Results:

Presents the data and findings without interpretation.

Discussion:

Interprets the results, explains significance, and connects to the research question.

References:

Lists all sources cited in the article.

Feedback:

Great job! Understanding the structure of a scholarly article helps you quickly locate the information you need.

✅ Activity 2: Developing a Research Topic

Type: Branching Scenario

Title: From Idea to Research Question

Instructions:

Start with a broad topic and make choices to refine it into a focused research question.

Scenario Flow:

Start:

You want to research climate change. What’s your next step?

Option A: Pick a region → Great! Narrowing by geography makes your topic more specific.

Option B: Pick an impact → Excellent! Focusing on an effect helps define your scope.

Next Decision:

You chose to focus on agriculture. What’s next?

Option A: Choose a time frame → Adding a time frame makes your question more precise.

Option B: Choose a population → Good choice! This adds context to your research.

Final Outcome:

Your research question could be: “How has climate change affected crop yields in British Columbia over the past 20 years?”

Feedback:

Well done! A strong research question is specific, focused, and researchable.

✅ Activity 3: Evaluating Information Using the SIFT Method

Type: Quiz (Multiple Choice + True/False + Scenario)

Title: Can You Trust This Source?

Instructions:

Answer the questions to apply the SIFT method to evaluate sources.

Questions:

Multiple Choice:

What is the first step in the SIFT method?

A) Investigate the source

B) Stop

C) Find better coverage

D) Trace claims

Correct Answer: B) Stop

Feedback:

Correct! Always pause before sharing or trusting a source.

True/False:

Checking other sources is part of “Investigate the source.”

Correct Answer: False

Feedback:

Actually, checking other sources is part of “Find better coverage.” Investigating focuses on the original source’s credibility.

Scenario Question:

You see a tweet claiming a major scientific breakthrough. Which SIFT step would help you verify this claim?

A) Stop

B) Investigate the source

C) Find better coverage

D) Trace claims

Correct Answer: C) Find better coverage

Feedback:

Correct! Looking for other reliable sources covering the same claim helps confirm accuracy.

Final Feedback:

Great work! Using SIFT helps you avoid misinformation and make informed decisions.

✅ Next Step

Do you want me to bundle these into a single microlearning module outline with suggested sequencing and timing, or create downloadable text files for each activity so you can upload them directly into H5P?

You said:

Create downloadable text files

Copilot said:

Copilot

Analysis

Here are your downloadable text files with full H5P activity content:

Activity 1: Image Hotspots – Scholarly Article

Activity 2: Branching Scenario – Research Topic

Activity 3: Quiz – SIFT Method

✅ Each file includes title, instructions, content, and feedback, ready to copy into H5P.

Would you like me to also create a combined microlearning module outline that sequences these activities with timing and suggested intro/conclusion text?

Results and Reflection

You said:
Expand on the sections of a scholarly journal article based on this information: Abstract: “Summarizes the research question, methods, and findings.”

Introduction: “Provides background and states the research question.”

Methods: “Explains how the research was conducted.”

Results: “Presents the data and findings.”

Discussion: “Interprets results and connects them to the research question.”

References: “Lists sources cited in the article.”The intended audience is freshmen undergraduates new to academic research and using the library.
Copilot said:
Copilot
Here’s an expanded explanation of each section, written for freshmen undergraduates who are new to academic research and using the library:

Abstract
The abstract is a short summary at the beginning of the article. It gives readers a quick overview of the research question, the methods used, and the main findings. Think of it as a snapshot of the entire article. If you’re deciding whether the article is useful for your assignment, the abstract is the first place to look.

Introduction
The introduction sets the stage for the research. It explains the background of the topic, why the research matters, and what question the researchers are trying to answer. This section often includes a brief review of previous studies so you can see how this research fits into the bigger picture.

Methods
The methods section describes exactly how the research was done. It explains the steps the researchers took, such as experiments, surveys, or data analysis. This section is important because it shows whether the research was done in a reliable way. If you ever need to repeat the study or understand how the results were reached, this is where you look.

Results
The results section presents the data collected during the study. It often includes tables, graphs, and figures to show what the researchers found. This section does not usually explain what the results mean—just what the data shows.

Discussion
The discussion interprets the results and explains what they mean in relation to the research question. It connects the findings to previous research, points out any limitations, and may suggest areas for future study. This section helps you understand why the results matter.

References
The references list all the sources the authors cited in the article. These are usually other scholarly works. If you want to find more information on the topic or check the original sources, the reference list is a great place to start.

Would you like me to turn this into a visual guide (like an infographic) for your students, create a short handout in plain language, or write a blog-style article for your library website?

You said:
add a disclaimer that journal article structure can vary based on the type of journal article. This structure is typical for original research articles.
Copilot said:
Copilot
Here’s the revised version with your requested disclaimer added:

Abstract
The abstract is a short summary at the beginning of the article. It gives readers a quick overview of the research question, the methods used, and the main findings. Think of it as a snapshot of the entire article. If you’re deciding whether the article is useful for your assignment, the abstract is the first place to look.

Introduction
The introduction sets the stage for the research. It explains the background of the topic, why the research matters, and what question the researchers are trying to answer. This section often includes a brief review of previous studies so you can see how this research fits into the bigger picture.

Methods
The methods section describes exactly how the research was done. It explains the steps the researchers took, such as experiments, surveys, or data analysis. This section is important because it shows whether the research was done in a reliable way. If you ever need to repeat the study or understand how the results were reached, this is where you look.

Results
The results section presents the data collected during the study. It often includes tables, graphs, and figures to show what the researchers found. This section does not usually explain what the results mean—just what the data shows.

Discussion
The discussion interprets the results and explains what they mean in relation to the research question. It connects the findings to previous research, points out any limitations, and may suggest areas for future study. This section helps you understand why the results matter.

References
The references list all the sources the authors cited in the article. These are usually other scholarly works. If you want to find more information on the topic or check the original sources, the reference list is a great place to start.

Important Note
Journal article structure can vary depending on the type of article and the journal’s guidelines. The sections described above are typical for original research articles, which report new findings. Other types of articles—such as literature reviews, case studies, or theoretical papers—may look different.

Would you like me to format this as a one-page handout for students, create a blog post for your library site, or design an infographic for classroom use?

You said:
add in information about conclusions
Copilot said:
Copilot
Here’s the updated version with Conclusions added and the disclaimer included:

Abstract
The abstract is a short summary at the beginning of the article. It gives readers a quick overview of the research question, the methods used, and the main findings. Think of it as a snapshot of the entire article. If you’re deciding whether the article is useful for your assignment, the abstract is the first place to look.

Introduction
The introduction sets the stage for the research. It explains the background of the topic, why the research matters, and what question the researchers are trying to answer. This section often includes a brief review of previous studies so you can see how this research fits into the bigger picture.

Methods
The methods section describes exactly how the research was done. It explains the steps the researchers took, such as experiments, surveys, or data analysis. This section is important because it shows whether the research was done in a reliable way. If you ever need to repeat the study or understand how the results were reached, this is where you look.

Results
The results section presents the data collected during the study. It often includes tables, graphs, and figures to show what the researchers found. This section does not usually explain what the results mean—just what the data shows.

Discussion
The discussion interprets the results and explains what they mean in relation to the research question. It connects the findings to previous research, points out any limitations, and may suggest areas for future study. This section helps you understand why the results matter.

Conclusions
The conclusion is often a short section at the end of the article that sums up the main findings and their importance. It may also highlight practical applications or recommendations for future research. While the discussion goes into detail, the conclusion gives you the “big picture” takeaway.

References
The references list all the sources the authors cited in the article. These are usually other scholarly works. If you want to find more information on the topic or check the original sources, the reference list is a great place to start.

Important Note
Journal article structure can vary depending on the type of article and the journal’s guidelines. The sections described above are typical for original research articles, which report new findings. Other types of articles—such as literature reviews, case studies, or theoretical papers—may look different.

Would you like me to turn this into a student-friendly infographic, create a one-page printable handout, or write a blog post for your library website?

You said:
include a section explaining the article title and author information and why that it is important to review.
Copilot said:
Copilot
Here’s the fully updated version with a new section on Title and Author Information, plus the disclaimer and conclusions:

Title and Author Information
The title tells you what the article is about, often highlighting the main topic or research question. Pay attention to keywords in the title—they can help you decide if the article is relevant to your assignment.
Author information is also important. It usually includes the authors’ names, their institutional affiliations, and sometimes their credentials. This helps you judge the credibility of the research. Authors affiliated with universities or research institutions are generally considered reliable sources. If you see multiple authors, it often means the research was a collaborative effort.

Abstract
The abstract is a short summary at the beginning of the article. It gives readers a quick overview of the research question, the methods used, and the main findings. Think of it as a snapshot of the entire article. If you’re deciding whether the article is useful for your assignment, the abstract is the first place to look.

Introduction
The introduction sets the stage for the research. It explains the background of the topic, why the research matters, and what question the researchers are trying to answer. This section often includes a brief review of previous studies so you can see how this research fits into the bigger picture.

Methods
The methods section describes exactly how the research was done. It explains the steps the researchers took, such as experiments, surveys, or data analysis. This section is important because it shows whether the research was done in a reliable way. If you ever need to repeat the study or understand how the results were reached, this is where you look.

Results
The results section presents the data collected during the study. It often includes tables, graphs, and figures to show what the researchers found. This section does not usually explain what the results mean—just what the data shows.

Discussion
The discussion interprets the results and explains what they mean in relation to the research question. It connects the findings to previous research, points out any limitations, and may suggest areas for future study. This section helps you understand why the results matter.

Conclusions
The conclusion is often a short section at the end of the article that sums up the main findings and their importance. It may also highlight practical applications or recommendations for future research. While the discussion goes into detail, the conclusion gives you the “big picture” takeaway.

References
The references list all the sources the authors cited in the article. These are usually other scholarly works. If you want to find more information on the topic or check the original sources, the reference list is a great place to start.

Important Note
Journal article structure can vary depending on the type of article and the journal’s guidelines. The sections described above are typical for original research articles, which report new findings. Other types of articles—such as literature reviews, case studies, or theoretical papers—may look different.

✅ Would you like me to combine all of this into a polished one-page handout for students, create a blog post for your library website, or design an infographic for classroom use? Or maybe all three?

**end of chat**

Co-Pilot Discussion (unedited)

Prompt:

draft a twine story about an undergraduate student selecting credible sources with branches that include choosing all credible sources, choosing a few credible and some not credible sources, and one branch where they don’t choose anything credible. include questions and choices and results.

Response:

Here’s a **draft Twine story outline** you can use as a starting point. It includes branching paths for three outcomes: all credible sources chosen, mixed choices, and none credible.

***

### **Title:** *Choosing Credible Sources*

***

#### **Passage 1: Introduction**

    You’re writing your first research essay. Your professor expects you to use credible sources. You’ve found five options online. Which ones will you choose?

    [Continue]

***

#### **Passage 2: The Sources**

    Here are your options:

    1. A peer-reviewed journal article from a university database.

    2. A Wikipedia article.

    3. A blog post by an unknown author.

    4. A government report (.gov).

    5. A YouTube video by a popular influencer.

    Select the sources you want to use:

    [[Choose Sources]]

***

#### **Passage 3: Choice Interaction**

(Use checkboxes or links for each source in Twine.)

    Which sources will you include in your essay?

    [[Journal Article]] -> $journal = true

    [[Wikipedia]] -> $wiki = true

    [[Blog Post]] -> $blog = true

    [[Government Report]] -> $gov = true

    [[YouTube Video]] -> $youtube = true

    [[Submit Choices]]

***

#### **Passage 4: Results Logic**

Use conditional statements to branch:

    (if: $journal and $gov and not $wiki and not $blog and not $youtube)[

    You chose all credible sources! Great job. Your essay will be strong and well-supported.

    [[Play Again]]

    ]

    (else-if: $journal or $gov)[

    You chose some credible sources, but also included questionable ones. This could weaken your argument. Consider revising your choices.

    [[Review Tips]]

    ]

    (else)[

    None of your sources are credible. Your essay will lack academic integrity and may fail. Learn how to identify reliable sources.

    [[Review Tips]]

    ]

***

#### **Passage 5: Review Tips**

    Credible sources are usually:

    – Peer-reviewed articles

    – Government or institutional reports

    – Books from reputable publishers

    Avoid:

    – Wikipedia (good for background, not citation)

    – Blogs without credentials

    – Influencer videos

    [[Try Again]]

***

### **Branch Outcomes**

*   **All credible:** Positive feedback + option to replay.

*   **Mixed:** Constructive feedback + tips.

*   **None credible:** Strong warning + learning resources.

***

Would you like me to **write the full Twine script in SugarCube format with variables and conditional logic ready to copy-paste**, or **create a visual storyboard diagram showing the branching paths**? Or both?

SugarCube Script generated:

twine isn’t fully supported. Syntax highlighting is based on Plain Text.

:: StoryInit

<<set $journal = false>>

<<set $wiki = false>>

<<set $blog = false>>

<<set $gov = false>>

<<set $youtube = false>>

:: Start

You’re writing your first research essay. Your professor expects you to use credible sources. You’ve found five options online. Which ones will you choose?

[[Continue->Sources]]

:: Sources

Here are your options:

1. A peer-reviewed journal article from a university database.

2. A Wikipedia article.

3. A blog post by an unknown author.

4. A government report (.gov).

5. A YouTube video by a popular influencer.

Select the sources you want to use:

[[Journal Article->Choose Journal]]

[[Wikipedia->Choose Wiki]]

[[Blog Post->Choose Blog]]

[[Government Report->Choose Gov]]

[[YouTube Video->Choose YouTube]]

When you’re ready:

[[Submit Choices->Results]]

:: Choose Journal

<<set $journal = true>>

You selected the **Journal Article**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose Wiki

<<set $wiki = true>>

You selected **Wikipedia**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose Blog

<<set $blog = true>>

You selected the **Blog Post**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose Gov

<<set $gov = true>>

You selected the **Government Report**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose YouTube

<<set $youtube = true>>

You selected the **YouTube Video**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Results

<<if $journal and $gov and not $wiki and not $blog and not $youtube>>

You chose **all credible sources**! Great job. Your essay will be strong and well-supported.

[[Play Again->Restart]]

<<elseif $journal or $gov>>

You chose **some credible sources**, but also included questionable ones. This could weaken your argument. Consider revising your choices.

[[Review Tips->Tips]]

<<else>>

None of your sources are credible. Your essay will lack academic integrity and may fail. Learn how to identify reliable sources.

[[Review Tips->Tips]]

<</if>>

:: Tips

Credible sources are usually:

– Peer-reviewed articles

– Government or institutional reports

– Books from reputable publishers

Avoid:

– Wikipedia (good for background, not citation)

– Blogs without credentials

– Influencer videos

[[Try Again->Restart]]

:: Restart

<<set $journal = false>>

<<set $wiki = false>>

<<set $blog = false>>

<<set $gov = false>>

<<set $youtube = false>>

[[Start]]

Decision flowchart ver 1

Revised prompt:

add in a page in the twine story about what distinguishes a credible from a non-credible source

revised sugarcube script:

:: StoryInit

<<set $journal = false>>

<<set $wiki = false>>

<<set $blog = false>>

<<set $gov = false>>

<<set $youtube = false>>

:: Start

You’re writing your first research essay. Your professor expects you to use credible sources. You’ve found five options online. Which ones will you choose?

[[Continue->Sources]]

:: Sources

Here are your options:

1. A peer-reviewed journal article from a university database.

2. A Wikipedia article.

3. A blog post by an unknown author.

4. A government report (.gov).

5. A YouTube video by a popular influencer.

Select the sources you want to use:

[[Journal Article->Choose Journal]]

[[Wikipedia->Choose Wiki]]

[[Blog Post->Choose Blog]]

[[Government Report->Choose Gov]]

[[YouTube Video->Choose YouTube]]

When you’re ready:

[[Submit Choices->Results]]

:: Choose Journal

<<set $journal = true>>

You selected the **Journal Article**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose Wiki

<<set $wiki = true>>

You selected **Wikipedia**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose Blog

<<set $blog = true>>

You selected the **Blog Post**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose Gov

<<set $gov = true>>

You selected the **Government Report**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose YouTube

<<set $youtube = true>>

You selected the **YouTube Video**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Results

<<if $journal and $gov and not $wiki and not $blog and not $youtube>>

You chose **all credible sources**! Great job. Your essay will be strong and well-supported.

[[Play Again->Restart]]

<<elseif $journal or $gov>>

You chose **some credible sources**, but also included questionable ones. This could weaken your argument. Consider revising your choices.

[[Review Tips->Tips]]

<<else>>

None of your sources are credible. Your essay will lack academic integrity and may fail. Learn how to identify reliable sources.

[[Review Tips->Tips]]

<</if>>

:: Tips

Credible sources are usually:

– Peer-reviewed articles

– Government or institutional reports

– Books from reputable publishers

Avoid:

– Wikipedia (good for background, not citation)

– Blogs without credentials

– Influencer videos

Want to learn more?

[[What Makes a Source Credible?->Credible]]

[[Try Again->Restart]]

:: Credible

**What Makes a Source Credible?**

Credible sources typically:

– Are written by experts or scholars with verifiable credentials.

– Are published by reputable organizations (universities, government, recognized publishers).

– Include citations and references to support claims.

– Are peer-reviewed or fact-checked.

– Are current and relevant to your topic.

Non-credible sources often:

– Lack author credentials or transparency.

– Are published on personal blogs or social media without evidence.

– Contain biased or promotional language.

– Lack citations or rely on opinions instead of facts.

[[Back to Tips->Tips]]

:: Restart

<<set $journal = false>>

<<set $wiki = false>>

<<set $blog = false>>

<<set $gov = false>>

<<set $youtube = false>>

[[Start]]

Decision flowchart designed by Microsoft Co-Pilot ver 2

Prompt: give this twine a catchy title to catch students’ attention

Response:

Here are some catchy, student-friendly title ideas for your Twine story:

“Source Sleuth: Can You Spot What’s Credible?”

“The Research Quest: Choose Wisely!”

“Credible or Not? Your Essay Depends on It!”

“Mission: Reliable Sources”

“Fact or Fluff? Test Your Source Skills”

“The Credibility Challenge: Will You Pass?”

“Choose Your Sources: The Academic Survival Game”

Each one adds a sense of fun and challenge while clearly signaling the learning goal.

Do you want me to pick one and update the Twine script with this title, or give you a short tagline to go with the title for extra engagement?

Prompt: Choose title 5 and create a tagline

Response:

Great choice! Here’s your title and tagline:

Title:

Fact or Fluff? Test Your Source Skills

Tagline:

Can you separate solid research from shaky claims? Your essay depends on it!

Would you like me to update the Twine script with this title and tagline at the start page, and make the introduction more engaging to match the tone?

Prompt: add the tagline and title to the twine script and make the introduction more engaging to match the tone

Here’s the **updated Twine script** with your chosen title, tagline, and a more engaging introduction:

***

### **Updated SugarCube Script**

“`twine

:: StoryInit

<<set $journal = false>>

<<set $wiki = false>>

<<set $blog = false>>

<<set $gov = false>>

<<set $youtube = false>>

:: Start

**Fact or Fluff? Test Your Source Skills** 

*Can you separate solid research from shaky claims? Your essay depends on it!*

You’re about to start your first research essay. The stakes are high: your professor expects credible sources, and your grade depends on making smart choices. 

You’ve found five possible sources online. Some are trustworthy, others… not so much. Can you pick the right ones? 

[[Start the Challenge->Sources]]

:: Sources

Here are your options:

1. A peer-reviewed journal article from a university database.

2. A Wikipedia article.

3. A blog post by an unknown author.

4. A government report (.gov).

5. A YouTube video by a popular influencer.

Select the sources you want to use:

[[Journal Article->Choose Journal]]

[[Wikipedia->Choose Wiki]]

[[Blog Post->Choose Blog]]

[[Government Report->Choose Gov]]

[[YouTube Video->Choose YouTube]]

When you’re ready:

[[Submit Choices->Results]]

:: Choose Journal

<<set $journal = true>>

You selected the **Journal Article**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose Wiki

<<set $wiki = true>>

You selected **Wikipedia**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose Blog

<<set $blog = true>>

You selected the **Blog Post**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose Gov

<<set $gov = true>>

You selected the **Government Report**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Choose YouTube

<<set $youtube = true>>

You selected the **YouTube Video**.

[[Back->Sources]]

:: Results

<<if $journal and $gov and not $wiki and not $blog and not $youtube>>

✅ You chose **all credible sources**! Great job. Your essay will be strong and well-supported.

[[Play Again->Restart]]

<<elseif $journal or $gov>>

⚠️ You chose **some credible sources**, but also included questionable ones. This could weaken your argument. Consider revising your choices.

[[Review Tips->Tips]]

<<else>>

❌ None of your sources are credible. Your essay will lack academic integrity and may fail. Learn how to identify reliable sources.

[[Review Tips->Tips]]

<</if>>

:: Tips

Credible sources are usually:

– Peer-reviewed articles

– Government or institutional reports

– Books from reputable publishers

Avoid:

– Wikipedia (good for background, not citation)

– Blogs without credentials

– Influencer videos

Want to learn more?

[[What Makes a Source Credible?->Credible]]

[[Try Again->Restart]]

:: Credible

**What Makes a Source Credible?**

Credible sources typically:

– Are written by experts or scholars with verifiable credentials.

– Are published by reputable organizations (universities, government, recognized publishers).

– Include citations and references to support claims.

– Are peer-reviewed or fact-checked.

– Are current and relevant to your topic.

Non-credible sources often:

– Lack author credentials or transparency.

– Are published on personal blogs or social media without evidence.

– Contain biased or promotional language.

– Lack citations or rely on opinions instead of facts.

[[Back to Tips->Tips]]

:: Restart

<<set $journal = false>>

<<set $wiki = false>>

<<set $blog = false>>

<<set $gov = false>>

<<set $youtube = false>>

[[Start]]

“`

***

✅ **Title and tagline added** 

✅ **Introduction rewritten for engagement** (challenge framing, stakes, tone) 

✅ **Visual cues** (✅, ⚠️, ❌) for feedback

***

Would you like me to **also add a quick self-check quiz on the “Credible” page** (e.g., “Which of these is most credible?” with clickable answers), or **create a matching H5P activity to complement this Twine scenario for your portfolio**?